Ron Paul: Bernie Sanders is Principled, but Not Consistently Antiwar

Fox Business host Kennedy asked Ron Paul on Wednesday to address the similarities between Paul and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), whose presidential campaign, Kennedy noted, has much support from young people as did Paul’s presidential campaigns.

Paul responded that Sanders is a principled individual — just as Paul was in presidential campaigns and as a Republican US House of Representatives member from Texas. This, Paul suggests, appeals to young people who are “idealistic” and “willing to listen to different viewpoints” instead of being “locked in place” in political views as “middle aged and older people” more often are. The appeal of the two candidates to young people also arises, Paul suggests, from young people believing Paul and Sanders “are telling the truth” and “are not just giving them a lot of political talk.”

Yet, while Paul says Sanders is a fellow principled individual, Paul also says in the interview that Paul and Sanders’ differing principles lead them to take some very different stands on some matters. Zeroing in on foreign policy and militarism, Paul mentions Sanders gave support for US wars in Libya and Kosovo, as well as for “all the military budgets.” While acknowledging that Sanders did not vote for the Iraq War, Paul concludes that Sanders otherwise “basically votes with the neoconservatives.”

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Five Minutes Five Issues: Warmongers Party, Obama Distortion, Trump on War, Lying Cops, Free Speech

A new episode of Five Minutes Five Issues posted today. You can listen to it, and read a transcript, below. You can also find all episodes of the show at SoundCloudYouTube, and Stitcher. The show will soon be available via iTunes as well.

Listen to the show here:

Read a transcript of the show, including links to further information regarding the topics discussed, here:

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity welcomes you to Five Minutes Five Issues.

Starting in five four three two one.

Continue reading

Judge Napolitano: Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee is Pro-Government on Big Constitutional Issues

Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst and former New Jersey State Judge Andrew Napolitano declared in a Fox News interview today that President Barack Obama’s new Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland is “almost always on the side of the government” on matters related to several constitutional provisions. This conclusion, Napolitano explains, is based on Napolitano’s initial review of Garland’s activities as a federal judge over the last 19 years.

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

US Setting Up African Quagmire

While much attention is focused on the United States government’s decades of military intervention in the Middle East, the US government is behind-the-scenes developing another huge intervention quagmire in Africa. In a Tuesday interview with host Scott Horton on the Scott Horton Show, international affairs writer Eric Margolis presented some of the steps taken so far to repeat in Africa the US intervention failures of the Middle East.

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Don’t Put Your Faith in Apple, Judges, or Congress to Protect Your Privacy

If we put our faith in technology company Apple, the United States courts, or the US Congress to protect our privacy, we may well find ourselves sorely disappointed. That is the message of Ron Paul Institute Senior Fellow Adam Dick in a newly released interview on the Wake Up Call Podcast.

Speaking with hosts Adam Camac and Daniel Laguros, Dick explores the legislative and judicial battle over whether the US government can require Apple and other companies to help the government access individuals’ private electronic information that is protected by passcodes, encryption, and other security measures.

While Apple is taking a turn as privacy hero in some recent court disputes, Dick notes the company also has a history of aiding the government in accessing private information on electronic devices.

In the federal courts, a New York magistrate judge has received much attention for his rejection of a US government request that Apple be required to help breach the security of an iPhone connected to a criminal investigation. However, Dick explains that this judge also suggests there would be no problem with courts routinely issuing such orders, if only Congress would pass some new legislation on the matter.

Over in Congress, some legislators are rushing forward with declarations that they want to protect privacy, encryption, and electronic devices’ security measures. But, can we trust Congress to protect our private information from government snooping? Dick addresses how Congress’ recent track record on restricting government snooping is not so hot. Congress’ reform effort in response to whistle-blower Edward Snowden’s revelations of the great extent of the US government’s mass surveillance program, for example, resulted in the USA FREEDOM Act that allows the mass surveillance to continue instead of ending it.

These are some of the issues, among many, Dick discusses in the in-depth podcast interview. You can listen to the complete interview here:

Find links to articles and resources mentioned in the interview here on the on the Wake Up Call Podcast website.

Reprinted with permission from the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

The Ron Paul Institute Launches New Audio Show: Five Minutes Five Issues

There are thousands of podcasts out on any topic you can imagine. There are plenty of good programs dealing with foreign policy and civil liberties as well. RPI staff often appears on these and we enthusiastically applaud their work. So why on earth would we launch our own audio program when the market seems so well covered? We want to do something different. That is why the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity is launching today a new audio show: Five Minutes Five Issues.

What does that mean? It means we will deliver to our listeners a tiny capsule of concentrated news and analysis on the issues we need to keep on our radar screens. We all know how the mainstream media filters the news. We will try to deconstruct the spin and pull out the facts. And we will do it faster than lightning! Who doesn’t have five minutes to get up to speed on tomorrow’s headlines? We hope you enjoy the new program. We will be making adjustments as we go and as usual we are happy to have your feedback and suggestions.

Five Minutes Five Issues can be found at SoundCloud and YouTube, as well as on the RPI blog. The show will also soon be able via Stitcher and iTunes, so you can subscribe and never miss a program.

The five topics addressed in the first five-minute episode are a New York federal court decision regarding iPhone security and encryption, the indictment of people involved in the 2014 Bundy Ranch protests, the US government keeping Saudi Arabia’s secrets, Donald Trump’s statements regarding torture, and marijuana seizures on the US/Mexico border.

Listen to the show here:

Read a transcript of the show, including links to further information regarding the topics discussed, here:


The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity welcomes you to Five Minutes Five Issues.

Five four three two one.

Continue reading

Andrew Napolitano Examines Hillary Clinton’s ‘Continuing Pattern of Lying’ in Email Scandal

Former New Jersey State Judge Andrew Napolitano says in a new video editorial that it is part of Hillary Clinton’s “continuing pattern of lying” to claim her actions related to her private email server while she was United States secretary of state were not criminal and were like actions taken by her predecessors in the office. Napolitano further explains that Clinton’s claim seems wrong in two ways. First, her actions appear to be criminal. Second, her predecessors did nothing like what she did.

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Judge Napolitano: Indictment Certain in Clinton Email Scandal Before November

Expect the indictment of former United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or one or more of her high-level aides from the State Department in the next few months.

Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano explained in a Fox Business panel discussion last week that the granting of immunity against self-incrimination to Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the private email server for Clinton that is central to an ongoing investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), means the Department of Justice intends to secure indictment of a person or people up the “totem pole” from Pagliano in the Hillary Clinton email scandal. Concludes Napolitano, “I think there will surely be indictments prior to November.” November, of course, is when the US presidential general election, in which Clinton hopes to compete as the Democratic nominee, will take place.

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Lawrence Wilkerson: Sen. Richard Burr is ’Ultimate Protector’ of CIA Torture Criminals

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) is “the ultimate protector” of United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) torture criminals, writes College of William & Marry Professor Lawrence Wilkerson in a powerful Thursday editorial in The Charlotte Observer.

Wilkerson, an Academic Board member of the Ron Paul Institute and a retired US Army colonel, discusses in the editorial how Burr has sought to keep the US government’s torture activities hidden from public view. Instead of ensuring oversight and accountability as the committee chairman, Burr has, Wilkerson concludes, been aiding a cover-up that even encourages US presidential candidates to depict torture as desirable instead of as a despicable criminal activity.

Continue reading at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.